Let be a closed, connected, smooth -manifold.

Our goal is to describe all strictly convex projective structures on . To this end, we seek a strictly convex domain such that is homeomorphic to the orbit space for some subgroup of . Recall that is properly convex if its closure lies in an affine patch, and that is strictly convex if it is properly convex and if contains no line segment of positive length.

A marking gives a holonomy representation

Proposition. determines ; hence, determines .

Proof. This follows from the fact that is the limit set of .

Thus describing strictly convex projective structures on amounts to describing holonomy representations .

Let denote the set of all holonomy representations of strictly convex projective structures on . We have

Theorem (Benoist 2000). is both open and closed in .

We will prove the “open” part of this theorem using a general result of Thurston and Ehresmann.

-MANIFOLDS, THE HOLONOMY THEOREM

Let be a manifold, and let be a Lie group that acts continuously (and hence analytically) and transitively on by diffeomorphisms.

Recall that a manifold is a -manifold if there exists an atlas of such that the transition map

is the restriction of an element of whenever is nonempty, and such that the following cocycle condition is satisfied:

Alternatively, is a -manifold if and only if it is homeomorphic to a quotient for some discrete torsion-free subgroup of . Then the action of on is properly discontinuous and free, and the diagram

commutes. Here acts on the universal cover of by deck transformations, is the developing map, and is the holonomy of .

Theorem (Thurston–Ehresmann). Let be a closed, connected, smooth -manifold. Then the set of all holonomies of -structures on is open in .

Sketch of proof (Thurston 1978). Let be the universal cover, and let be a fundamental domain. There exist finitely many charts fo covering . For each index , we choose small enough that is one-to-one on , and we use to identify with a subset of . We have

where the equivalence relation is given by

Here is the idea of the proof: If is close to a holonomy representation , then there are maps close to the maps satisfying the cocycle condition. Then define

where the relation is defined by replacing with above.

Why can we do this? Take the nerve of the cover, i.e., a graph with one vertex for each set and one edge between corresponding vertices whenever is nonempty. We may assume without loss of generality that the sets are round balls, so that is connected. Now let be a maximal tree with a chosen basepoint. Define to be if the edge for is in ; otherwise, choose so that the based loop in containing the edge for is , a product of maps around the loop.

Theorem (Kozul 1962). is open in .

Proof. Suppose we are given a strictly convex projective structure, and hence a holonomy representation by the Proposition, and a nearby representation . By the holonomy theorem, there exists a nearby projective structure, and this structure is a strictly convex structure (why?).

HESSIAN METRICS

Let be open, and let be a smooth function that is strictly convex (i.e., whose Hessian matrix is positive definite). The map induces a Riemannian metric on given by

where

is the Hessian matrix of .

For example, the map given by induces the Euclidean metric on .

Recall that a nonzero tangent vector is specified by a smooth curve with and , where and . Then by strict convexity, where .

Let be an affine -manifold. Then we have charts and transition maps in the affine group .

Let be smooth. Then

Thus determines a Hessian metric on .

Remark. The Vinberg character functions on cones (April 14) are examples of this phenomenon.

Theorem. Suppose is a simply connected boundaryless affine -manifold with a complete Hessian metric . Then the developing map is injective and has image a convex set.

Proof. Since is simply connected, the developing map is a diffeomorphism, so we identify with its image in .

Let be distinct; we must show that the line segment joining them is contained in . Consider the triangle formed by , , and an arbitrary point . Let be the straight-line paths paths from to and from to , respectively. For each , let be the straight-line path from to . We claim that

Then for some for all , and we are done by completeness.

Let for each . We have

The first inequality follows from the Cauchy–Schwarz ineqality, and the last inequality (for some ) follows from compactness. This proves the claim.

Previous Post: Lecture 13: Projective Structures on Surfaces Part III


Next Post: Lecture 15: Tautological Line Bundle