LAST TIME: Let be the standard quadratic form on of signature , let be the upper half of the cone , and let be the upper sheet of the hyperboloid . We have a map

where is the projective model of hyperbolic space and

Recall that is the center of mass of in the affine patch .

TODAY, we’ll do a more general construction, starting with an arbirtrary fixed properly convex domain in projective space. The machinery we get out of it, along with John’s ellipsoid theorem (see below), will enable us to prove Benzecri’s compactness theorem.

Let , fix a properly convex domain , let be the cone of , and let be the dual cone. Define by

where is Lebesgue measure on .

To compute explicity, we decompose into slices as follows. For each and each , let

Note that is the intersection of with a hyperplane in . We have

Multiplication by gives a map . We have for some differential -form on . Then

It follows that

for all . The level sets of behave like from last time.

The -form maps into . If , then

so that

The action of on induces an action of on given by , where is given by . It follows that is -equivariant. We calculate

There is a natural map making the diagram

commute. (Here the vertical maps are the quotient maps).

Remark. In Goldman’s notes, it is shown that has positive Hessian and is a diffeomorphism.

Now we’ll define the duals of the maps and . As you’ll see, the definitions of these functions look similar to those of and .

Define by

and define by

where

is the intersection of with a hyperplane in for each and each . Now let

The map sends each to the intersection , where is the unique hyperplane in such that has center of mass at .

Remark. In general, is not equal to the identity map, but it is if is . Thus the preceeding construction is a generalization of the construction from last time.

Now we just need some more notation to state Benzécri’s compactness theorem.

Let denote the set of all properly convex domains in . Topologize by giving it the Hausdorff topology on closures. Let . The action of on induces an action of on . This action is not very nice in that the orbit space is not Hausdorff (remember the “tear drop in a triangle” example from class), but we can get a nicer action by considering pointed domains instead.

Let be the set of all ordered pairs , where and . The topology on gives a topology on , and the action of on gives an action of on .

Theorem (Benzécri compactness). The action of on is proper and cocompact.

We’ll use the following two results to prove this theorem:

Fact. If acts properly on and is a compact subset of , then

is a compact subset of .

Theorem (John ellipsoid). Let be a compact convex set with nonempty interior and center of mass at the origin. There exists a unique ellipsoid of maximal volume contained in and centered at the origin. Furthermore, .

By applying an affine map if necessary, we may assume that the John ellipsoid of is the unit ball centered at the origin.

Let be the set of all ordered pairs , where is an ellipsoid and . Then acts transitively on pointed ellipsoids with point stabilizers isomorphic to , so acts properly and cocompactly on .

Proof of Benzécri compactness. We define a map as follows. Given , let . Then is the center of mass of , regarded as a subset of the affine patch . Now let be the John ellipsoid for in these coordinates, and set .

The map is continuous, well-defined, and -invariant from what we proved earlier. The fibers of are cocompact, since there are only compactly many domains between a ball and . Therefore, the action of is proper and cocompact.

Corollary. If is a properly convex domain and is a discrete subgroup of , then the action of on is properly discontinuous.

Corollary. If is a properly convex domain, is a subgroup of , and the action of on has a fixed point, then is conjugate into .

Previous Post: Lecture 5: Properly Convex Geometry


Next Post: Lecture 7: The Margulis Lemma