Last time, we saw a theorem stating that the subgroup of transformations in that preserve an affine patch is isomorphic to the affine transformations in -dimensional Euclidean space. To see this in general, we first introduce the idea of projective coordinates.

If our vector space has a basis then we write \[ [t_1:\cdots:t_{n+1}] := [t_1 v_1 + \cdots + t_{n+1}v_{n+1}]. \]

Then we consider the affine patch of points where . In this affine patch, we can rewrite the projective coordinates so the last coordinate is 1.

Now if preserves this affine patch, we find

So when we apply to the vector we get a vector of the form . The set of all transformations taking a vector to the vector is called the affine group.

Example Affine Manifold

We consider the space . We let be a basis for . Then the points with the lines between each pair divide into 4 triangles. We label the middle triangle .

Next, we let where and are diagonal matrices with entries and respectively. Since both transformations have all positive coordinates, preserves our 4 triangles in .

Then is an affine torus, which is homeomorphic to a torus. To see this we note that in the affine patch , the rectangle is a fundamental domain of which is moved by transformations that stretch or compress the rectangle. Applying a log transformation to the first quadrant gives a homeomorphism to , where now acts by translation and hence the quotient by is clearly a torus.

For the next theorem it is useful to note that because linear maps send vector subspaces of to other vector subspaces, transformations in similarly preserve projective subspaces (eg projective lines) in .

(A) Fundamental Theorem of Projective Geometry

If , and are open sets in , is a continuous map , and sends (line) to (line) for all projective lines, then is the restriction of a projective transformation.

This can be interpreted as saying if preserves “lines” (the intersections of lines with U), then also preserves “projective subspaces.”

Proof: There exists a projective basis contained in such that is another projective basis. Then there exists a unique projective transformation such that (considering as an ordered basis). Then the map preserves “lines” and fixes . We now want to show is the identity map.

So, we may assume is a transformation from to itself that fixes the projcetive basis . We proceed by induction on the dimension of .

First, if then our projective basis has 4 points. Let denote the six “lines” (lines intersected with ) that contain 2 points in . Since sends each “line” to itself, fixes a set of points composed of together with the 3 additional points lying on 2 lines in . Next we let be the set of line containing 2 points in , obtain from by adding points contained in two lines in , and continue in this fashion. The union of all sets will be a dense set in that is fixed by . Since is continuous, this shows that is the identity.

We show how the induction works by sketching the case. Now is a projective basis of , and we know that is the identity on . Then preserves each “plane” containing 3 points in . By the step, we have that is the identity on each of these planes. Now we use a similar construction to the step to again get a dense set of points fixed by .

The Klein (or Projective) Model of

We can model the hyperbolic plane as a disc in the “light cone” in defined by . We let denote the unit disc inside this cone at height . Then the disc in is

The set of projective transformations that fix is

There exist homomorphisms from to :

  • the trivial homomorphism ;

  • the homomorpism , a reducible homomorphism;

  • there also exists an irreducible homomorphism defined as follows:

acts on the vector space considered as the vector space of quadratic forms on , that is, polynomials of the form .

Let be a quadratic form, written as

We then identify with the vector . Now let be a linear transformation. Then define as the following quadratic form:

It is easy to calculate that , so we have defined an anti-homomorphism. So we must fix this define our homomorphism by . This is our irreducible homomorphism, and it restricts to a homomorphism taking to .

Previous Post: Lecture 1: Introduction to Projective Geometry


Next Post: Lecture 3: Properly Convex Domains